For operators

Pooling to the NExT level.

On-demand ride-pooling, DRT, feeders

NExT pods join your fleet as single units or convoys.
Road-legal, electric, on the road today.

The numbers for an operator

−52%
vehicle travel costs vs on-demand services
New York University
−48%
savings from modularity
KTH Stockholm
−44%
fleet total cost of ownership (Singapore case)
NTU Singapore

Parallel pooling

In classic ride-pooling every detour stretches everyone's ride, and re-sorting passengers takes fixed hubs: alighting, waiting, re-boarding.

With NExT, pods dock where needed. The intervehicular doors open, passengers redistribute by destination without getting off, the modules split: each on the most direct route.

Passenger exchange between two docked NExT pods

Passenger exchange between docked modules

The exchange point is dynamic: the NExT MaaS Platform picks it, only if and where it pays.
The average fill rate rises (around 2x) and the economic advantages are clear even with one driver per pod (compared to taxis and standard ride-pooling).

e⁻e⁻e⁻e⁻γ

Two electrons exchanging a photon, in Feynman notation

“I’m often asked where the idea for NExT came from, the intervehicle transfer in particular. I have to admit that my Physics studies in Padua were illuminating. Just as particles in Feynman diagrams exchange quanta of energy, in NExT the pods exchange the ‘quanta of mobility’: the passengers. Optimizing transport, then, becomes a matter of solving a physics problem.”

Tommaso Gecchelin · Founder and CEO

Transfer between modules lets you split, consolidate or reorganize loads, wherever it makes sense.

PICK-UPEXCHANGE NODEDESTINATION ADESTINATION B

Split. A pod with two destinations on board docks with the waiting module: those branching off change modules, and everyone continues nonstop to their own destination. It is the geometry of the last-mile: from the trunk connection to passenger distribution across the surrounding area.

PICK-UPPICK-UPEXCHANGE NODEDESTINATION

Consolidation. The mirror-image scheme: two pods bound for the same destination join up, one continues full, the other stays at the node for the next run. It is the geometry of the first-mile: pickups spread across the area, one full shuttle to the airport.

PICK-UPEXCHANGE NODEDROP-OFFPassengers regroup bydestination throughthe intervehicular doors

Double exchange. Reorganization between modules: different destinations in, sorted convoys out

Intervehicle transfer is already demonstrated on the road: the real footage.

Compared

Classic poolingNExT · parallel pooling
TransferGet off, wait, re-boardChange module between coupled pods, no getting off
Exchange pointFixed hubDynamic, chosen by the platform
DetoursShared, a round trip for allNone, each pod goes straight
CapacityFixed (van)Follows demand, 1 to 5 pods
Vehicle travel costBaselineUp to −52% (Fu & Chow 2023)
DriverWith driverWith driver today, L4 in development

The same service, two geometries

Shuttle layouts

Shuttle M2 class A layout

Shuttle M2 · class A

9 seats + 7 standing + driver. Maximum capacity for high-turnover stretches.

Shuttle M2 class B layout

Shuttle M2 · class B

9 seats + driver, everyone seated. 900 litres of baggage space for feeders and airport links.

Dimensions, battery, CCS2 charging: the full technical sheet.

The NExT MaaS Platform

With the NExT MaaS Platform, our fleet simulation and management software, you can compare your current operation with the NExT solution before deployment.
Request a demo or a study dedicated to your needs. It's one of the four tools in the NExT software suite.

NExT MaaS Platform · built in-house

The scientific base is public: over 80 peer-reviewed studies on modular systems, with quotes and sources.

Common questions

How does modular pooling lower the cost per passenger?
Beyond flexible capacity, passenger transfers between pods make exchange points possible anywhere, extending the benefits of pooling. Peer-reviewed studies report up to −52% vehicle travel cost (Fu & Chow, 2023, Transportation Research Part C) and up to −44% fleet total cost of ownership (NTU Singapore).
Are the pods road-legal, and who drives them?
NExT pods are road-legal and driver-operated. L4 autonomy is in development and can be integrated on request in dedicated areas. Nothing on this page assumes driverless operation.
Doesn't one driver per pod defeat the cost case?
No, because the scenario is pooling, which stays competitive even with one driver per pod. Passengers redistribute by direction through the inter-vehicle doors, so each pod runs a fuller, more direct trip, without the shared detours of classic pooling. The result: with the same number of vehicles and drivers you can carry far more passengers.
Can we test it on our own network before committing?
Yes. The NExT MaaS Platform lets you compare your current operation with the NExT solution before any deployment. A demo is free; a dedicated study on your network is a paid engagement. You can request a proposal through the form below.
Where does modular pooling actually pay off?
Where demand is uneven and detours are costly: on-demand and DRT services, feeders to airports, stations, events and shopping centres, where the first-last mile makes standard vehicles inefficient. Three peer-reviewed results on modular pooling: up to −52% vehicle travel cost (New York University), up to −48% savings from modularity (KTH Stockholm), up to −35% passenger travel cost (NYU Abu Dhabi).

Request a proposal

By sending this request you confirm you have read the privacy notice.

← Back to home